RichTheNewbie wrote: > I dunno. I wouldn't underestimate the government backing it could get, to > push things through, if it really is all it's cracked up to be. Do wonders > for energy security and the economy. However the question remains as to how > much is really down there and whether it is wo...

Rexco wrote: > They have a professor from Imperial College saying that the UKOG find is in > line with their expectations and that the Jurassic formations are expected > to be full of oil. > > Maybe now is not the time to short but to buy, but what do I know, I'm in > RRL. That was on BBC news 5 min...

They have a professor from Imperial College saying that the UKOG find is in line with their expectations and that the Jurassic formations are expected to be full of oil.

Maybe now is not the time to short but to buy, but what do I know, I'm in RRL.

From what I read of the article that was posted it could easily be libelous and so WS minders had to ban the poster. Personally I do not anyone posting lies on here and I find those quoting RNA's from Range and saying they are lies should also be banned. The RNA's have to be accurate and just becaus...

Wikki

I think you are getting mixed up, you cannot get a dog in this respect to get moving.

Range will only get moving if it is a latent star that can be moved out of its current torpitude and into a dynamic state.

Rich

As far as I am aware the 20 Exponential Moving Average is used to trade Forex during the day (not to be held overnight) so quite why you would want to use it for Range shares I cannot imagine.

ATB

Rex

Thanks for the explanation.

I am just keeping my head down and praying for 4,000 BOPD by the end of 2014.

That should get it above 2p with a bit of luck.

JH

I have no idea what you are talking about other than it doesn't make any logical sense.

You cannot have a powerful breakout from one position and then say it could be from a lower level. They are not the same thing.

Is this chartist gobble de gook?